Friday, February 12, 2010

Burning Desire

Prompt 2: Choose a character in a novel or play of your choice (from the AP List!) and write about the conflict(s) that arise since they are in conflict with the society they are from. This may be socially, religiously, and/or morally. Dig deep! You should also address whether your character comes to a good/bad fate due to this conflict(s).

He ignored society’s rules and followed his instincts. A harmless act yet abhorred by society. Guy Montag of Ray Bradbury’s Fahrenheit 451 was caught in a social turmoil. He was a fireman; a man whose job it was to hunt out all books and destroy them by burning them. Now, in a greatly censored society, he is searching for answers in the very place he is forbidden to even glance at. By looking for the truth in books that the government had banned years ago, Montag is shunned and outcast from the only place he ever knew.

In Bradbury’s world, all books that evoke negative emotions are deemed as unfit to read and therefore claimed as contraband. The only books that have survived the government’s mad censorship were generally worthless and brainless entertainment. Therefore, the people of this time have lost the art of reading comprehension. It was not enough for Montag to merely be a fugitive with illegal books in possession. He was a fugitive with contraband that he could not even understand. He was frustrated that none of the books made sense to him. Countless times, he felt ready to give up and confiscate the books himself, yet he had an innate attraction to the intricacies of the written language that he had never previously been exposed to elsewhere. Thus, he felt conflict within himself. He longed to understand, yet he barely had the patience or knowledge to do so.

However, regardless of his comprehension skills or efforts in reading these books, he was condemned just for having them in his possession. If captured, he would be sentenced to death. Nevertheless, Montag desperately wanted to help his fellow citizens because he knew that censorship would lead them to ruin, yet they shunned him. He carried the burden, the knowledge that self-destruction was inevitable, alone. He felt helpless while he witnessed the destruction of his world from afar.

Guy Montag had nowhere to run, no friends to turn to, no one he could trust. He was isolated because he was caught in a world where ignorance was promoted by the citizens and knowledge was punished by the government. This was the only world he knew, but he willingly turned his back on it. He looked for salvation in the books he burned and instantly found confusion and heartache. Yet, his curiosity and innate desire for knowledge made him persistent enough to continue searching for the answers he and previous generations have been deprived of in the place everyone else was scared to look.

(37 minutes to write the essay)

11 comments:

  1. I wish I had the art of reading comprehension but sadly, I am a mere giraffe. Awesome second paragraph taking the conflict a level deeper. Last sentence is a little confusing but I have an aforementioned lack of comprehension ability. Good idea giving a short summary in the beginning.

    (9 minutes to write this comment)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very nice!

    The wording was a little officious so I had to reread it a couple times to find your points in each paragraph. Otherwise, the ideas were very sound and you adressed both external and internal conflict.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Powerful. Succint. Your essay fully demonstrates the depth of Montag's conflict. Great novel choice, you perfectly represented the conflict of Fahrenheit 451.

    Normally I would point out anything you could fix but I thought it was flawless. Amazing job.

    ReplyDelete
  4. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey Arielle.

    Sorry, something happened to my other comment. Anyways this is what I had written.

    Me gustó mucho tu ensayo. Fue muy fácil de seguir y sus puntos eran buenos. Hiciste un gran trabajo. Me gusta el título del ensayo también No puedo esperar para leer más.

    Camille Raymond

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wow. I am always impressed by the way you write. You go very deep and everything is so easy to understand. Your introductory paragraph is so captivating.
    Great conflict choice for this prompt. I absolutely love your character's conflicts. Those types of conflicts and storylines just appeal to me. Or maybe it seems that way because you make it interesting through your writing.

    ReplyDelete
  7. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  8. From the moment Aunty Lisa read your intro paragraph to our class, I was in love with your essay. Reading the rest of your essay only intensified my love for this masterpiece and your writing style. I had to read it twice just so I could take in and savor all of its deepness. Very effective and powerful. Great job! :o)

    ReplyDelete
  9. Wow Arielle this is AWESOME!!! =)
    I really love the way you worded everything and I really love the novel that you are talking about. Just from reading your essay, I am already very interested in reading the novel itself. =)
    I also just wanted to let you know that I love the way that you write. It's not like a big pile of mumble jumble and you don't repeat yourself a lot and your writing is also not confusing at all. Very understandable. Very very good work, I LOVE IT!!!!!!! =) =) =)

    Oh and good job of telling the reader what the story is about, without actually giving away a lot of the story and the ending. =)

    ReplyDelete
  10. arielle!

    WOW

    That basically sums up what I was thinking the whole time haha. Your essay was very well written and you focused directly on the conflict that Guy Montag was experiencing. Your examples also focused on this character's conflict with the society. You did reaaaaaaaaally well :D

    ReplyDelete
  11. *snaps* you go gurl!

    I found this very powerful and right on target!
    Such a wonderful essay!

    I think the only thing to work on is getting rid of useless words.
    Ex: "He was a fugitive with contraband that he could not even understand." (2 paragraph)
    The word "even" can be taken out. (idk?stupid? :D)
    Taking out words can make an essay more straightforward and less "dramatized."

    LOVED IT!
    (btw my dad would like yo dad to call us tomorrow when he is not busy. :D We got electric issues :[)

    ReplyDelete